Which film is worse - Loose Change or Great Global Warming Swindle?

[dana1981]

Whatever arguments you can come up with (i.e. dishonest, bad science, bad for America, bad for the world, etc.). Best argument for which film is worse gets 10 points.

[Fun_Robert]

never heard of either one.

[Frank]

Loose Change brings up very good questions, but it's a little heavy on the bias. It's not objective enough, and just oozes with young and angry-at-the-government resentment. It goes too far in blatantly pointing the finger at the 9/11 perpetrators, rather than not touching the "who did it" part of the 9/11 conspiracy. Needs to be redone and reedited. They need to get a different person to narrate it as well.

Great Global Warming Swindle actually is a good film- it brings up many of the points that I wish Global Warming supporters would realize, about earth's cycles and really the % contribution of greenhouse gases we humans produce. It's a great film that debunks a lot of the misconceptions about Global Warming, but it too is very biased in not fessing up to the fact that we do contribute to global warming. We are not the main cause as many people think, but we DO contribute to it. My only argument is that it doesn't talk about just how much we DO contribute or what we should do about it. I just got the sense that the filmmakers wanted people to watch it and think "Well, that's great to know that we don't have to worry about it! Whew!" ... when in fact, it does deserve scrutinizing.

Loose Change is a worse film.

[RAY N]

This was a attempt by the Brits and euros to take the yanks money Why do you think they were so mad